| Plays for MNF |
|
How can we miss? This looks just like last night's play. Well, not really. These are two slow-scoring teams, the Chiefs especially. But the Chiefs do figure to have the running game, and they do figure to have more first downs. We don't think the Chiefs will be able to sustain long drives with their short passing game, though. The Pats are near the top in pass defense early in the season. On the other side, the Pats may have trouble sustaining drives with their subpar run game supporting their own short passing attack. It adds up to neither team being able to sustain anything. Let's hope that's reflected in the scoring. The 47 is near the norm for an NFL Total and we're projecting less than 40 points between the teams, so let's make this our first UNDER play of the season. |
| Plays for SNF |
|
It's always hard to bet against the Saints because they are the local boys. They are our team. It would be nice if the Cows just hooked them in a close game, but who are we kidding? We'll root for that anyway. Football, like gambling, is exciting, but guess what, rooting doesn't make a difference. The score is going to be the same in the end.
These two are the same team. More offense than defense. The Saints are a little better on O, the Cows a little better on D. Dallas has the run game, though, and they're playing in Dallas, and Dallas has the point spread. Those are good indicators for the Boys but things can deteriorate quickly if they don't keep their heads in the game. Definitely one we want to be careful with. Just the one chip. |
| Plays for Sunday |
| The numbers for our projected outcome look a lot like the actual numbers when Pittsburgh handled Carolina last week. If we were fully human we'd really be impressed by that, and the fact that Pitt beat the Pants in Charlotte. AND the Pants have to travel to Baltimore where the Ravens easily handled the Steelers. But we're only half human, and the machine half is saying that Carolina won't be able to run the ball. Now THAT's impressive. That's why they lost at home to the Steelers. We're only trying to win one chip but with the 3 point spread the odds are such that we have to risk 1.2 chips to do so. |
|
| When it's early in our database construction the system is more likely to kick out a rout. We usually don't pay much heed to those picks. Heck, we'll put out our NO-SHOW forecast later in the season that completely ignores NO-SHOWS. In this case, however, the Jags have been non-existent since the first half of the first game. You could say that the NO-SHOW IS their personality. Maybe we're being too hard on Jacksonville but the Chargers have been playing good ball this year. Just betting the minimum and hoping it doesn't turn into a game. |
|
| Plays for Thursday nite |
|
We doubt if we'd be going this way without the computer. Statistically, the Skins are putting up the best numbers in the league, while the Giants stats are simply lukewarm. You'd think those numbers, with the Skins HFA, would have the system pointing Washington's way.
The biggest reason the GRIDLINE algorythm went with the Giants is because of the strength of schedule. We factor in previous opponents in the formula, so it gives the edge to a team that has the stronger schedule, even if they have the same numbers. Early in the season, the schedule strength dominates the calculations because the disparity can be so wide. We actually thought this was a deficiency in our logic several years ago, but our general malaise allowed us to discover that schedule strength IS a good indicator early in the season. In other words, the Giants may have played better in their loss to the Cards than the Skins did in their rout of Jacksonville. Back to the real world. The Cousins kid is a real passer, and lord knows Washington has needed a passer ever since RG3's knees went out. Still, you have to think this rivalry game might be close. we're still going a little slow, so let's keep it at a minimum on the road dog. |
|
Good Luck Everyone!